Free Quote


Becoming 5010 Compliant: Frequently Asked Questions

Receive RMK's FREE White Paper "Becoming 5010 Compliant: Frequently Asked Questions"



Find us on facebook



Medical Bill and Claim Resolution


Medical Bill Help for Consumers

Click Here Now 




Written by RMK Holdings Inc.   
Sunday, 05 February 2012 22:23

Medscape recently posted an interesting piece that discussed Why Income May Drop if You Sell Your Practice to a Hospital: How to Correct These ProblemsThe article cites the collection results for a New England hospital that bought a stake in different practices that had a total physician count of 82. The decision was made to centralize billing operations under the control of the hospital's finance VP.

 

After about 15 months, the net collections for these doctors had decreased by 18 percent!

 

Their practices, once profitable, were losing money and placing the physician salaries at risk. The net collection percentage was 93.75%. This indicates that 6.25% of deductibles, co-pays and other fees did not get collected. Acceptable results are 95%. In fact, well run medical billing operations collect over 97% of charges minus contractual adjustments. Further study revealed three issues:

  • The VP knew very little about the nuances of medical practice billing.
  • The practices had been performing at an acceptable level regarding billing and collections prior to being acquired by the hospital.
  • When the billing became centralized, the connection between front desk and billing staff, so essential to efficient billing, was non-existent.

Another factor that contributed to the sub-par results at this hospital was that the lack of dedicated practice billing and collection staff resulted in less involved doctors. This was seen in their diminished oversight, decreased coding responsibilities and the fact that the physicians felt more like employees.

 

Physicians Joining Hospitals

 

According to 2012 AHA statistics, hospitals employ about 20% of all physicians. Just five years ago, the estimation was that 80% of all doctors would be working for a hospital by 2012. The New England Journal of Medicine reported that a hospital employing a physician can count on losses of between $150,000 and $250,000 for the first three years. Plus, the MGMA (Medical Group Management Association) reported that hospital owned practices are 25% less productive than ones that are privately owned.

 

Physicians with practices they are considering selling to a hospital might want to discuss these issues with the hospital administration:

  • Establishing an incentive system rewarding good financial results.
  • Making sure the physicians are responsible for their practice's financial performance.
  • Maintaining billing and collections at the practice level (as opposed to centralizing).
  • Hiring coding consultants to perform audits. Then using the results as a base, ask them to conduct customized coding and documentation workshops to keep physicians, providers and billing staff sharp.
 
Written by RMK Holdings Inc.   
Friday, 20 January 2012 21:01

It’s practically undebatable that vast financial pressures are affecting most U.S. doctors negatively – one of these is the need for ever more expensive malpractice insurance, along with current guidelines for medical care that some doctors feel are unfairly based on strict conditions related more to avoiding liability than to actually curing the patient. While this kind of economic and philosophical problem is a huge one for doctors, it’s not the only reason that many of them are choosing to shutter their practices and move into other jobs. There’s also the explosion of complicated protocols and contractual obligations related to billing insurance companies, which is becoming a greater share of accounts receivable for the typical doctor’s office. Then there are the many growing issues with collecting from patients, as American families continue to feel the sting of the 2008 financial collapse and the subsequent recession, along with high unemployment.

But although there are a number of very real reasons for doctors to give up their independent practices, there’s also a large emotional side of this choice for many of the doctors who decide to leave their profession, or get into an employee situation, such as a hospitalist’s job, with less responsibilities for managing provider administration. Doctors simply feel overburdened and overwhelmed, and in some cases, they may not be relying on partners that could help them rejuvenate a struggling practice. Third-party medical billing consulting firms and other enterprises are built to help doctors outsource some of the headaches of the medical profession, so that they can focus on healing patients, while benefiting from best current practices for billing and collecting money. This is definitely something to think about for doctors to really don’t want to stop doing what they have been doing, and who feel invested in the medical profession. It’s a scary world for today’s physician, but many doctors are finding that by using competent and competitive third-party services, they don’t have to go it alone.

 
Written by RMK Holdings Inc.   
Sunday, 08 January 2012 21:20

In addition to all of the medical billing changes projected for this year, and entitlement reimbursement legislation that's challenging America's physician practices, there's another item that many doctors are paying attention to that is related to Medicare and Medicaid. It's called a RAC audit and involves recovery audit contractors who work on behalf of entitlement programs to spot Medicare or Medicaid fraud or other types of overpayments.

 

It's no secret that Medicare and Medicaid fraud are massive problems within the American healthcare industry. However, for the majority of physician practices that operate honestly, RAC audits are less likely to turn up actual fraud but more likely to turn into a huge hassle for a struggling medical business that's trying to treat patients every day, collect accounts receivable and comply with all of the extra work of identifying payers and maintaining patient records.

 

The Daily Practice Blog, a resource for physicians, offered some tips late last year about how to handle these RAC audits including:

  • Have an up-front policy and a strategy for responses to external inquiries. Most physicians know that these auditors can pull a certain number of patient charts, and forward thinking physicians are directing staffers on how to do this if it should become necessary.
  • Doctors who are anticipating this kind of audit will also think about when it makes sense to appeal an auditor's decision and when that appeal may be more trouble than it's worth.
  • Another big step provided regards medical necessity, which, as many physicians know, is a frustrating, subjective term that can often seem like an unfounded attack on a physician's judgment. But as experts in these types of audits point out, problems are often related to a lack of documentation or explanation rather than an actual challenge to the medical necessity of any given procedure, especially since the great majority of physicians are extremely likely to go by the book in terms of diagnosis and subsequent treatment.

So, as medical businesses get ready for 2012 and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services prepares to ramp up RAC audits, go forward boldly, developing a competent response plan, so that you can rest easy about this eventuality and get back to treating patients. Good patient documentation will help you with audits, and will also help with all of the many potential problems related to medical billing to insurance companies, entitlements and patients, leaving your medical office better able to accomplish its goals in the new year.

 
Written by RMK Holdings Inc.   
Sunday, 01 January 2012 00:05

With all the other pressures now directed at doctors in the form of medical malpractice insurance requirements, medical billing problems, and the push toward more sophisticated electronic health record systems, there are also big changes coming along in terms of government reimbursement for medical procedures. One of these proposed changes comes in the form of Accountable Care Organizations or ACOs that may replace other reimbursement models for government entitlement programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

In government materials presented to the public by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services on the Healthcare.gov website, the federal government describes the adoption of Accountable Care Organizations as “paying physicians based on value, not volume.” This goes along with other recent descriptions of these Affordable Care Act provisions by legislative and executive political figures. The debate over Accountable Care Organizations has been somewhat vigorous: some government figures and others contend that these changes will help to provide medical offices with incentives to perform more applicable treatments to patients depending on their specific health conditions. Critics of the programs say that they could lead to “rationing care” as doctors evaluate the mandates of the affordable care act in a down economy.

According to Healthcare.gov, these changes are expected to be effective January 1 of 2015. This gives offices just three years to anticipate what ACOs would contribute to the overall climate of medical billing and reimbursement for their practices. The creation of Accountable Care Organizations by the new healthcare reform act is only part of what worries many providers about taking on Medicare and Medicaid patients. It seems like each year, physicians struggle with changing reimbursement models and potential delays or downgrades in payments. Many doctors fear that the fundamental changes proposed in the new legislation may compound this difficulty, but like all of the other pressures related to medical billing, forward thinking doctors can meet with staff to plan detailed responses to issues around Medicare and Medicaid billing, in order to develop intra-office strategies that will help to streamline the payments that the medical provider can expect, not just from government programs, but from private insurance companies and patients alike. It takes creative and proactive measures to get a practice’s medical billing activities running at full speed, and the doctors with the most successful accounts receivable outcomes usually work hard at encouraging their staff to work smarter, and in many cases, harder, to resolve billing issues. This holiday season, doctors with qualms about upcoming health care mandates should take a page from this playbook, even if it means a few extra hours at the office.

 
Written by RMK Holdings Inc.   
Tuesday, 08 November 2011 14:54
Part 1: Enabling your Patients to Pay Easier

 

A recent article in the New York Times by Ann Carrns, Medical Debt Cited More Often in Bankruptcies, from 12 to 13 percent for those citing medical debt as a factor in financial counseling.

 

She also goes on to point out that people do not want to default on medical payments. In fact, instead of not paying their healers, they will pay their medical bills with new credit cards. However, those cards may carry high interest charges especially if patient has poor credit.

In addition to that, co-pays and deductibles will do nothing but increase regardless of any health care reform implementation.

 

All the more reason to develop sound front end strategies designed to make sure the patients understand their payments precisely and to make sure you make it easy and manageable for patients to pay.

 

Here are three ways to do that:

  • Use historical payments, insurance payouts and actual treatment data to develop accurate patient responsibility costs. This will increase your point of service collections and reduce days in accounts receivable.
  • Verify patient information accuracy. Compare self-reported patient information with data on various financial information databases. This will help avoid potential claim denial errors and improve the efficiency of your registration process.
  • Obtain a financial profile on your patient that can be summarized into meaningful healthcare metrics. This will increase your point-of-service collections and also reduce days in accounts receivable.

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next > End >>
Page 1 of 9